Regionalise the Lords?
I often like to ask MPs why the House of Lords is allowed to scrutinise English legislation but not that of the devolved administrations. Why, I ask, should Neil Kinnock have any say on English legislation?
Invariably I am told that the House of Lords is not based on geographic constituencies so the issue of nationality and national interest does not come into it; Neil Kinnock, for example, does not sit in the House of Lords to represent Wales.
Now I hear that Hazel Blears wants the Lords to represent UK regions.
It seems that if they can't regionalise England through referenda they will do it by any means possible. How very dare they? The dirty bastards!
Trackback URL for this post:
The historic vote in favour of a 100% elected House of Lords raises the prospect of the West Lothian Question being replicated in the upper chamber.
As you will know Westminster is a bicameral parliament which means that legislation is scrutinised by a s
"Could a future Prime Minister sit in an elected House of Lords?", asked Norman Lamont on Monday.
The answer that came back was "No".
Concern was expressed that proportional representation could confer upon the Lords greater democractic legitimacy than
- Launch of the Blueprint for ‘Scotland’s Future’: A Red-Letter Day for England?
- Time for a festival of Englishness
- Peter Black AM facing two ways at once
- Jacob Rees-Mogg: England without Scotland would be a small, shrunken, shrivelled place
- Can Ed Miliband Speak for England
- Nick Clegg’s Geopolitical Fruit Kebab
- One Year to Go
- Scottish Lib Dem MPs are of a high calibre says Clegg
- Congratulations to the UK and Scotland
- The Rise of the Little Englander